<meter id="htdyb"><listing id="htdyb"></listing></meter>
      1. <code id="htdyb"></code>
      2. <tr id="htdyb"></tr>

          1. <code id="htdyb"></code>

            手機APP下載

            您現在的位置: 首頁 > 口譯筆譯 > 英漢翻譯素材 > 外交與國際 > 正文

            美國槍支暴力泛濫的事實真相(4)(中英對照)

            來源:可可英語 編輯:Villa ?  可可英語APP下載 |  可可官方微信:ikekenet

            III. Gun Violence Lays Bare the Decline of U.S. Governance Capacity

            三、槍支暴力問題凸顯美國治理能力衰敗

            Given a political system where different sides hold each other back, an increasingly polarized political ecosystem, pervasive interest groups and ineradicable racial discrimination, gun control in the United States is in stalemate, and a total ban on guns is effectively a mission impossible.

            相互掣肘的政治體制、日益極化的政治生態、無孔不入的利益集團、難以根除的種族歧視,使美國槍支管控舉步維艱,全面禁槍幾乎成為一項“不可能完成的任務”。

            How the U.S. political system is designed and operates constitutes the root cause of ineffective gun control. Gun control intensity varies across different states, making it increasingly difficult to regulate guns and perform interstate enforcement. Everytown for Gun Safety, a gun control group, compared gun policies across the country, rating every state on the strength of its gun laws and comparing it with its gun violence occurrence. A positive correlation was found between ineffective gun control and gun violence rate. Eight states, including California and Hawaii,?with comparatively well-established gun laws saw relatively low gun violence rates, while the 13 states with the weakest gun control, including Texas, Alaska and Missouri, have nearly three times as many gun deaths as the eight states mentioned above.

            美國政治制度的設計與運作是槍支管控不力的深層根源,各州關于槍支管控的規定松緊不一,槍支管控和跨州執法愈發困難??貥尳M織“每個城鎮支持槍支安全”對比了全美各地的槍支政策,給每個州控槍立法的力度評分,將其與槍支暴力發生率進行對比,發現控槍不力和槍支案發生率呈正向關聯:加利福尼亞、夏威夷等8個州槍支法律相對完備,槍支案發生率整體較低,而在得克薩斯、阿拉斯加、密蘇里等槍支管控最薄弱的13個州,槍擊死亡人數幾乎是上述8州的三倍。

            Positions of Democrats and Republicans on gun control are becoming increasingly polarized. In 1968, the House voted 305-118?and the Senate 70-17?to pass the Gun Control Act. Since then, the two parties have been increasingly divergent over gun control. Republicans have always supported gun ownership, while Democrats have unequivocally supported gun control. Given the polarized U.S. political landscape at present, it is even more difficult for either party to compromise. The New York Times reported that since the mass shooting at Sandy Hook, despite a Democratic push for gun control, 14 Republican-controlled states have gone the opposite way, passing laws allowing their citizens to carry guns without any licensing process. The Washington Post reported that in recent years, the Republican Party has posted a myriad of pictures and videos containing guns in newspapers, billboards and social media to appeal to voters who oppose gun control for campaigning purposes.

            民主共和兩黨在控槍問題上的立場日益兩極化。1968年,國會眾議院以305票對118票、參議院以70票對17票通過《槍支管控法》。此后,兩黨在槍支管控問題上的分歧日益嚴重。共和黨一貫支持民眾擁槍,而民主黨則鮮明支持控槍。在當前美國政治極化背景下,雙方更難妥協?!都~約時報》報道,桑迪胡克槍擊案以來,盡管民主黨推動控槍,而共和黨控制的14個州卻背道而馳,通過法律允許其公民不經任何許可程序就可攜帶槍支?!度A盛頓郵報》報道,近年共和黨為提升選情,大肆在報刊、廣告牌和社交媒體上使用帶有槍支的圖文視頻,以吸引反對控槍的選民。

            Interest group lobbying is rampant. Group politics and electoral politics in the United States have provided legalized channels for gun groups to conduct money politics and influence the stance of Congress members on guns. According to OpenSecrets statistics, from 1990 to 2022, gun ownership groups contributed 69.3 million U.S. dollars to federal and state candidates, while gun control groups contributed 51.6 million U.S. dollars. From 1998 to 2022, gun ownership groups spent 190.4 million U.S. dollars on lobbying, while gun control groups spent 28.9 million U.S. dollars. In the 117th Congress, 262 members have been sponsored by the NRA, among which 19 have each received more than 1 million U.S. dollars cumulatively. The vast majority of them are Republicans. Meanwhile, the NRA has spent handsomely against pro-gun control lawmakers. All five of the lawmakers whom the association has paid millions of dollars to oppose are Democrats.

            利益集團游說大行其道。美國的集團政治和選舉政治為擁槍團體提供了合法渠道,使其能大搞金錢政治,影響國會議員在槍支問題上的立場。據OpenSecrets統計,1990年至2022年,擁槍團體捐助6930萬美元給聯邦和各州候選人,而控槍組織則捐助5160萬美元。1998至2022年,擁槍團體花費1.904億美元用于游說,而控槍組織則花費2890萬美元用于游說。在第117屆國會中,曾獲美國全國步槍協會資助的議員多達262位,而累計獲得資助超過100萬美元的有19位,絕大多數是共和黨議員。同時,該協會還投入大量資金反對支持控槍的議員,其中投入上百萬美元反對的5名議員全部是民主黨議員。

            Gun violence is exacerbated by long-standing social problems in the United States such as social inequality and racial tensions. Research shows that blacks are much more likely to encounter gun murder than whites, and half of all gun murder victims are black. In 2010, 14.6 out of 100,000 blacks were murdered, compared with 1.9 for whites.?According to research by the CDC, between 2019 and 2020, gun homicides nationwide rose from 14,392 to 19,350, with the occurrence rate up from 4.6 to 6.1 per 100,000 people, a 34.6 percent increase.?Of the 90,498 gun-related deaths in 2020 and 2021, 38,796 were murders, among which nearly 21,000 involved young black males.

            社會不平等、種族矛盾等美國長期存在的社會問題加劇槍支暴力。研究表明,黑人遭遇槍支謀殺的概率遠高于白人,半數的槍支謀殺案受害者是黑人。2010年,每10萬黑人中有14.6人被謀殺,而白人為1.9人。據美國疾病控制與預防中心研究,2019年至2020年,全美槍支殺人案從14,392起升至19,350起,發生率從每10萬人4.6起升至6.1起,增長34.6%。2020年至2021年共計90,498起槍擊死亡案中,38,796起屬謀殺案,而涉及黑人年輕男性的近2.1萬起。

            Conclusion

            結束語

            The right to life is the biggest human right. The Declaration of Independence begins with the statement that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are unalienable rights. One gunshot after another have shattered the American Dream that all men are endowed with the unalienable rights to life and liberty, and lead people to reflect deeply on where the American-style human rights really are. Some U.S. politicians have long treated the American people's right to life with indifference. Faced with growing gun proliferation, they have done nothing more than empty talks and prolonged debates, while pointing fingers at the human rights conditions of other countries. The most important thing that they are duty-bound to do is face up to and address their own problems, and let the American people enjoy true freedom from the fear of gun violence.

            生命權是最大的人權。美國《獨立宣言》開宗明義指出,生命、自由和追求幸福的權利不可剝奪。一聲聲槍響,擊碎了所謂“人人得享不可剝奪的生存與自由”的美國夢,也讓人們不得不對美式人權到底在哪里進行深刻反思。美國一些政客長期漠視本國民眾生命權,面對日益嚴重的槍支泛濫問題,卻仍在夸夸其談、曠日持久的辯論中無所作為,并對他國人權指手畫腳。他們最應該并有責任做的是正視并解決自身問題,讓美國人民真正擁有免于槍支暴力恐懼的自由。

            重點單詞   查看全部解釋    
            appeal [ə'pi:l]

            想一想再看

            n. 懇求,上訴,吸引力
            n. 訴諸裁決

            聯想記憶
            comparatively [kəm'pærətivli]

            想一想再看

            adv. 比較地,相對地

             
            landscape ['lændskeip]

            想一想再看

            n. 風景,山水,風景畫
            v. 美化景觀

             
            shattered ['ʃætəd]

            想一想再看

            adj. 破碎的;極度疲勞的 v. 打碎;削弱;使心煩意

             
            violence ['vaiələns]

            想一想再看

            n. 暴力,猛烈,強暴,暴行

             
            vast [vɑ:st]

            想一想再看

            adj. 巨大的,廣闊的
            n. 浩瀚的太

             
            rampant ['ræmpənt]

            想一想再看

            adj. 猖獗的,蔓延的,奔放的

            聯想記憶
            inequality [.ini'kwɔliti]

            想一想再看

            n. 不平等,不平均,差異,多變性,不等式

             
            statement ['steitmənt]

            想一想再看

            n. 聲明,陳述

            聯想記憶
            indifference [in'difərəns]

            想一想再看

            n. 不重視,無興趣,漠不關心

             
            ?
            發布評論我來說2句

              最新文章

              可可英語官方微信(微信號:ikekenet)

              每天向大家推送短小精悍的英語學習資料.

              添加方式1.掃描上方可可官方微信二維碼。
              添加方式2.搜索微信號ikekenet添加即可。
              欧美日韩视费观看视频_被强奷到舒服的视频_日韩黄色片在线观看_毛色毛片免费观看
              <meter id="htdyb"><listing id="htdyb"></listing></meter>
                1. <code id="htdyb"></code>
                2. <tr id="htdyb"></tr>

                    1. <code id="htdyb"></code>

                      <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链>